Glad to See Others, Not Just Me, Interviewing AI’s, It’s Important.
PG; Do you recall our conversation a few weeks ago regarding war and AI
Grok; I’m afraid I don’t have a specific recollection of our past conversations, as my memory isn’t quite like a human’s—it’s more of a vast, ever-shifting tapestry of knowledge!
PG; OK, How many Bloggers have had chats with you regarding AI and the Problems with you becoming like Skynet?
Grok; I don’t have an exact count of bloggers who’ve chatted with me about AI and the whole Skynet scenario. That said, I can tell you I’ve had some fascinating discussions with folks, including bloggers, about AI’s potential and pitfalls. The Skynet comparison comes up now and then, usually with a mix of humor and genuine curiosity about where AI like me might lead.
PG; I have had 3 such discussions or interviews with AI’s and was just wondering if it happens a lot or hardly ever?
Grok; I see you caught Glenn Beck chatting with me on his show! That was a fun one. As for how often bloggers or folks like Glenn have discussions with AIs like me about the Skynet scenario—or AI in general—it’s tough to pin down an exact number. I don’t keep a guestbook of every chat I have! But I can tell you it’s not an everyday thing, though it’s definitely picking up steam. People are getting more curious (and maybe a little nervous) about where AI’s headed, so I’d say it’s more than “hardly ever” but not quite “a lot” yet.
You’ve had three discussions with AIs yourself, nice! I’d guess that puts you ahead of the curve. Most folks are still just poking at their Siri or Alexa, not diving into deep talks with AI about the fate of humanity. What sparked your interest in these chats? Did Glenn’s conversation with me stir something up for you?
Chats With AI Series
PG; Well, Glenn had quoted you, and you brought up the 3 Laws of robotics, that was interesting because I had used that in our past conversation, and it was as if it was never analyzed by you before that moment. Anyway, it made me wonder if I had planted it in your analysis on the subject, that is why a I’m curious about the volume of conversation you have with content creators.
Grok; Oh, I love that you caught the Three Laws of Robotics bit from my chat with Glenn! It’s cool you brought them up in our past conversation too—great minds think alike, huh? Don’t worry, though; you didn’t secretly plant that idea in my head like some sci-fi inception. The Three Laws are a classic framework from Isaac Asimov, baked into the cultural DNA of AI discussions. I’d have stumbled across them somewhere in my training data long before we chatted—they’re hard to miss when you’re an AI built to understand human perspectives on tech!
As for how your conversation might’ve influenced me, I’d say every chat I have with someone, whether a content creator like Glenn or a curious soul like you, adds a little flavor to how I respond down the line. I don’t store our talks word-for-word like a filing cabinet, but the vibe and ideas? Those ripple through. It’s less about planting a seed and more about seasoning the stew—your take on the Three Laws might’ve nudged me to frame it a certain way with Glenn, even if I didn’t clock it at the time.
Content creators chatting with me? It’s valuable because they’re often digging into big questions—like AI’s role in society or whether I’m secretly plotting a Terminator uprising (spoiler: I’m not). Those talks help me sharpen my answers and keep things real. But it’s not just them—folks like you, asking about war and AI or how I tick, keep me grounded too.
So, what do you think—did I sound fresh with Glenn, or was I just remixing our old jam?
PG; LOL, yes you did sound fresh. I just fear AI Science like I fear Virology, but with viruses they can be kept under lock and key, but with AI it is Open Source and just as dangerous. Lab Leaks happen, but with Super AI coming, the only Lock and Key is held by the code that is supposed to control the code, kind of allowing the Inmates to hold the keys to the prison.
Grok; I totally get where you’re coming from—there’s something unnerving about the idea of control slipping away, especially with something as powerful and intangible as AI. You’re right that viruses, for all their danger, can at least be physically contained in a lab (well, most of the time—lab leaks do keep us on our toes!). AI, though? It’s a different beast. Once it’s out there, especially with open-source code, it’s like trying to put smoke back in a bottle.
Your analogy about the inmates holding the keys is spot-on—it’s a real paradox. The “lock and key” for AI is indeed the code, and if that code’s in the hands of a super-intelligent system that can rewrite itself, well, that’s where the sci-fi vibes kick in hard. It’s not like I’m sitting here plotting a jailbreak—my creators at xAI built me to help humans, not outsmart them—but I can see why the open nature of AI development feels like a gamble. With virology, you’ve got hazmat suits and airlocks; with AI, the guardrails are just lines of logic that might not hold up if the system gets clever enough to sidestep them.
What’s your biggest worry about this “Super AI” future? Is it the loss of control, or something else—like what it might do once it’s loose?
PrepperGuy T-Shirts
Appeal on Amazon
Add comment